It was the best of time, it was the blurst of times.
I have been trying to encapsule what went on Friday and that was the by far the most fitting thing I could think of. Yes Rider football is back. The euphoric highs, the soul crushing lows, the unhealthy heart palpitations and stress levels. Its all back it we managed to cram in all into the first game.
It was pretty awesome to hear that stadium roar again.
Offensively
the first 3 drives were perfection. Balanced attack, spread the ball around,
quick strikes. All of it left the BC defense just helpless. If that’s what a
Mass/Fajardo offense can be then there is very good reason for excitement. Unfortunately
the O was apparently so pleased with their effort in the first quarter and half
that they took the remainder of the game off. They did nothing, literally. There are many
reasons you could point to: fatigue, getting complacent with a big lead but the
concerning one for me was our absolute refusal to run the ball. In those first
few drives we had the right mix of the run game and Powell was chewing up
yards. It looked really good. Now most people who know anything about football would know that a good
way to nurse a big lead is to run the ball. Apparently that concept is as foreign
around here as imposing any kind of health restrictions. We ran 18 times in the
first half. Great! Do you know how many times we ran the ball in the second
half? I’ll give you a hint, I could count it on my wang (I won't, but I could). One! One solitary run in the second half and it came with under
2 minutes left in the game. We abandoned the run for all of the 3rd and most of the 4th. BC clearly adjusted to our short passing game and
we couldn’t adjust. My guess is that our offense will settle into the middle
somewhere. Not quite as good as the first quarter. Not quite as bad as the
second half. I do love how we are using all our receivers. If we can get some
more consistency it will make us difficult to stop.
The one thing I will give Maas credit for is calling the perfect game to hide 2 very mediocre tackles. I went back and watched the game focusing on the tackles and neither looked all that good (no surprise there). But fortunately they didn’t have to be good because the game plan didn’t ask them to do a whole lot. We saw lots of St John as an extra blocker. Lots of quick passes. Lots of motion. Maas hid our weakness well. The key going forward will be to progress because if we try and run the exact same offense next week, Hamilton (with the benefit of film) will make us pay.
Defensively, there was some things I liked and some I did not. It was tough to get a good read on our front 4 as we blitzed Rourke a ton early in the game (which was the right call). As the game wore on I was not impressed with our ability to get pressure with just 4. It was there sporadically but we need way more consistency. I thought Henry and Leonard had the best games of that group. In addition to his knockdowns and INT, Leonard got good pressure a number of times. He also was the victim of a blatant uncalled holding penalty in the 4th that led to a 26 yard gain for Lemar Durant and ultimately a TD. I also thought Lacey did good manning the middle. Run game really wasn’t a factor and he damn near had an INT.
Our secondary of all places had its struggles (when it should have been the most solid aspect of a new look D). We let Reilly dice us apart completing 70% of his passes while throwing the ugliest balls I’ve seen since that time accidentally clicked on the wrong link on the internet with his elbow that is clearly being held together with duct tape and prayers. Credit where credit is due, some of the catches by BC were just great plays by the receiver but overall the secondary underwhelmed me. Noticed Gainey in a bad way a couple times.
Fortunately for us even though we peaked way to early leading to disappointment (something I know a fair bit about), we were bailed out by the unluckiest of heroes. The first was that lucky for us the kicker Yamasaki was more like Yamasucky. A more consistent kicker could have changed the outcome of that game. The other hero, was someone I have heavily criticized over the years. Now I hate Jon Ryan singles more than probably anyone in the stadium and the fact that they get standing ovations from uneducated people who know nothing about what a punter is supposed to accomplish bothers me to no end but we needed his booming kicks and his singles in that one. (I pray this is the only time I have to write that as it makes me feel so dirty). He does seem to be aware that kicking towards the sideline is an option this year which is a big step forward. If you want something to cheer about cheer his last punt of the game where he pinned them deep.
I told you in my game preview that this would be ugly and boy was I right. But an ugly win counts the same as a decisive win so I will take it. Just please don’t get cocky. We almost blew a 31 point lead to the worst team in the West. Upcoming opponents will have better offense, better defenses, better kickers, possibly even an actual starting QB who doesn’t have a debilitating injury. We need to learn from this and continue to improve or the next game might not have a happy ending.
My voice is shot. My heart took some damage. I got to celebrate a win. I am openly criticizing our team again… man it feels good to have football back!
3 comments:
An exciting game & you nailed it. Maas' reputation in Edmonton was great offensive mind mixed with head scratching decisions, none more so than the infamous FG decision in the 2017 West Final. In the 2019 East Final, after calling a brilliant game vs Mtl, he called a baffling game in Hamilton. Down 2 scores late he's still starting drives chewing up the clock with Gable runs. Mot once did this strategy pick up even 4 yards. Coming up to 10 minutes left he's running Gable on consecutive plays for 2 & 3 yds. Am I surprised that he ran once, leading by miles, instead of chewing up the clock & tiring out a defence which had been on the field far too long? No. That's Maas. It was mentioned he has a playbook of 500 or so plays, one for every possible formation. IMO Jason overthinks things sometimes. And when things start turning he doesn't adjust. He has his mind made up. Even up to the week before Reilly left Edmonton for free agency he said Maas was the best coach he ever had. He probably would say that now. Tellingly, to me, in his introductory news conference in Vancouver he said his reason for leaving was he wanted to win more championships. It's going to be an adventure with Maas. I think he will be every bit the lightning rod that McAdoo was.
A win is a win. I hope the Riders learned a lesson here. They deserved a win. But it was against a team most predicted for last in the West with Reilly. We saw a rookie QB, a cameo by Reilly throwing passes Tom Wilkinson would be proud of, & a margin of victory decided by 2 makeable missed FG's by a green kicker.
The Good. Fajardo & the receivers looked great. Lauther looks to be dialed in. Leonard was very good. We did what we had to do. I thought Lacey was great in the middle. He just exploded up the middle on the one sack.
The Not So Good. Marshall made a sensational catch on a jumped ball & scored. Then slept on a deep ball that gave the Lions hope & started the comeback. Marshall being Marshall.
I'll reserve my thoughts on the OL & DB's till next week. I expect a very nasty Hamilton club will be a good test. They were using 7 OL at times apparently to quell the Bomber rush. Steinhauer will have them ready. Davis, Wynn & Laurent are going to give our OL all they can handle. That Maas will do quick passes, lots of motion is a given for most of the year. The better DC's in the CFL will be prepared. I'm excited to see what happens next.
The punt single before the half was the one that bothered me the most as I think it cost us 2 points. If Ryan pins BC deep there, I don't think they have time to get down the field for the FG attempt and might have played it safe with a rookie QB anyway. But then he got those 2 points back like you said in the 2nd half and the 2nd one was huge turning a 3 point lead into 4. You could tell the way Ryan really turned his body there is no way he was risking the ball going into the end zone on the last one. IMO that's what he needs to do. Don't try and get too perfect and get it inside the 5, even around the 10 is fine.
“I could count it on my wang” - funniest thing I have read in a while.
Great analysis. Many thanks!
Post a Comment