But while I support reviewing
the current format and like some of the ideas being proposed, some the ideas
are stupid (It’s Monday morning… I haven’t had enough coffee for subtleties)
Let’s start with the
positive. Under the proposal, the first place teams in the East and West would
continue to get a first round bye. What would change is that the four next best
teams (regardless of division) would make the semi finals with the 3rd
and 4th place teams hosting a home playoff game. That way, the best 6
teams would make the postseason and the best teams would be rewarded with home
field advantage. Had it been in place in 2019, the semi final matchups would
have been Calgary hosting Edmonton and Winnipeg hosting Montreal. In 2018 it
would have meant that the Eskimos (who finished 5th in the West)
made the playoffs instead of the Ti-cats (who finished 2nd in the
East)… and the Riders would have played Edmonton instead of Winnipeg (not that
it mattered as Brandon Bridge wasn’t about to beat anyone that day).
While the current crossover
rule generally ensures the best teams make the playoffs (2018 is the only year
in recent memory where it didn’t), it has led to a lot of inferior East teams
being rewarded with home playoff games while superior West teams are forced to
travel (2015 is the only time since Ottawa returned to the league where the
host of the East Semi had the 3rd or 4th best record in
the CFL). So I’m all for this.
Here’s where Ambrosie loses
me though…
Under his proposal, the team
that finished first overall would then have their choice of which semi-final
winner they want to play. The theory here is that this would create intrigue
and bulletin board material and what not.
My issue with it is that it’s a gimmick. A stupid, hokey gimmick. I hate
gimmicks. They cheapen the product we are trying to market… and before you give
me the “but, but MLB is considering it and they are way bigger than us” let me
just say that a bigger league considering something stupid, doesn’t make it any
less stupid. Also, MLB is a league that can’t even properly deal with a massive
cheating scandal so maybe not the best comparison bar at this point.
The CFL is a league that has
survived and thrived based on its long and storied traditions. When we have
strayed too far from the core of who we are and into the gimmicky it has rarely
been successful (see: American expansion or anything related to the Gleibermans).
Change and adaptation are important but only when they make sense and enhance
your product… not cheapen it. We are a football league not a reality TV show. Leave
the rose ceremonies to the idiots on reality TV and focus on being a
respectable football league.
So keep the top 6 teams make it concept, but then #1 plays the lowest remaining seed in the West Final and #2
plays the highest remaining seed in the East final (and yes I am just assuming
the West team will be better than the East team most years, it’s pretty much
science at this point… 2019 was an anomaly). It’s fair, its simple, it avoids
lame-assed attempts to drum up publicity.
I’m the Rider Prophet and I
approve this message.