Riders 21 – Bombers 6
Coming into Saturday’s game both the Riders
and Bombers had a huge opportunity in front of them. Thanks to the Als beating the
Stamps, sole possession of first place (in addition to the season series) was
on the line. One team seized that opportunity. One team played like they really
don’t mind waiting another 29 years for a championship. For as long as I have
been a Rider fan they have had a tendency to do things the hard way. It was
refreshing to see them seize an opportunity.
Story of the game was the defense. They
came to play! They were physical. They were sound tacklers. They forced turnovers.
They dominated. I thought they executed a great game plan. Much like I talked
about pre-game, they were willing to give up some passes assuming (quite
correctly) that Steveler would eventually make mistakes. And boy did he. All 4
of our turnovers came when the Bombers were inside our 35. When it mattered
most, we made plays. The most impressive of which was McCray’s crazy int. I
really like how we controlled the run game. Streveler’s legs were not a factor.
Harris was contained. We forced them to the air and the results should surprise
no one. If the defense can keep up that level of play we should be in store for
a great November. Only problem is that most of the teams we will play can
actually pass. Man is it funny to see Bomber fans take back all the awful
things they said about Matt Nichols.
Through 3 quarters I was about to start
a petition to never allow Fajardo’s wife to another game. The D was dominating
and the O was doing nothing. They weren’t making mistakes but we should have been
way father ahead in that game for how much we were outplaying them. Fajardo
looked uncharacteristically flustered. Indecisive in the pocket and off target
on his throws. I wish we could find a way to summon whatever awakens in Fajardo
in the final 5 minutes of game at some point in the first half because his slow
starts are getting notorious but he always seems to deliver in the end. It’s
kinda like the opposite of my love life where I start fast and often disappoint
in the end. I like that we stuck with the run. Powell got double digit carries
despite not always having a ton of room. The Bombers have a great D . But if
you want a telling stat of how our offense did despite their struggles… neither
WiIlie Jefferson nor Adam Bighill recorded a solitary stat. Roosevelt was his
normal reliable self. Shaq Evans continues to develop into one of the top WRs
in the league. It wasn’t pretty but thanks in large part to not turning the
ball over, the O did enough to secure the win. I guess Mrs. Fajardo can come back.
As a sign of just how much we elevated
our play as a team when it mattered most, we did great in 2 areas we normally
struggle in. First, Dickenson was 2 for 2 on challenges. Normally he is just
awful in that regard. Second, Jon Ryan (for as a much as I’ve criticized him)
had his best day punting by far. I know 2 of them went for rouges but both were
outstanding kicks with just unlucky bounces. It was the first game where he
consistently found the numbers when punting.
The defense set the tone but the whole
team elevated their play when needed. For now we sit in sole possession of 1st
place. Our magic number to clinch a home playoff game is 2 (combination of Rider
wins and Bomber loses). But we have higher ambitions than just second. First place
is ours for the taking for the first time since 2010. We will have to face an
actual QB next week to get there.
4 comments:
On that short yardage play where they did try and throw deep, the Rider D did exactly what we talked about. I am pretty sure we stayed in our regular D and Marshall was having none of the deep pass.
Pretty much locks up 2nd. Bombers need to win all, Riders lose all to overtake them. Not going to happen. As I mentioned elsewhere we don't need to win by 28 in Calgary, just win by 1 point. Tiebreaker is essentially out of it if we win going 11-4 & drop Stamps to 9-6. With both teams having BC I just don't see either losing & we get them @ Mosiac. BC has beat Ottawa & Argos twice, lucky to beat Als who didn't have Adams. Thats it for Lions wins. We get Esks, Calgary gets the Bombers. So if we win by 1 the only way the tiebreaker comes in is if Calgary sweeps & we lose 2. I don't see us going 1-2 vs Lions & Eskimos. Unrealistic to think we could beat the Stamps by 28 at McMahon anyway IMO but a win by 1 would do just fine. Win the next one & firmly in the driver's seat. Lose & beat BC next week puts BC out if they aren't out already & Esks will rest bodies, likely won't see Harris.
Gov - that fake dive was predictable. I was glad to see the D was ready for it.
Seesee - if we beat Calgary (big if) then we need to win 2 of final 3 to guarantee first place... Doable given the schedule
True, Prophet. That's if the Stamps win out. Assuming a split with the Bombers we only need 1 of 3,by beating the Stamps by however many points. It's pretty likely the Esks will have nothing to play for come the final 2 games because, if they don't beat BC this week, the Riders have BC at home the following week & will want to win that game for sure, win or lose vs Calgary. I don't see the Schmos bringing back Harris till the playoffs unless they lose to BC AND the Riders lose the following week. All the Esks need is a win or BC loss. That could be settled this week. BC is playing better but it will be interesting to see if that OL really is any good after playing Ottawa (9th in sacks), Mtl (8th) & Argos (6th). Their winning streak really isn't a surprise. Reilly gives the Lions a big edge in QB'ing but the Eskimos lead the league in sacks & I suspect will get after him again. I have little faith in the Esks but don't buy the Lions being much improved based upon beating up on Argos & RB's who are getting worse by the week.
Post a Comment