With the Riders on a well-timed bye week
I thought I’d take the opportunity to compare where new head coach Craig
Dickenson is at as compared to where the man he replaced was at the same time
last season. For the purposes of this analysis I’m going to go beyond the
obvious things. You know, like the fact that Craig Dickenson awns more than one
shirt and seems to not have a deathly aversion to open buttons. And other obvious
things, like the fact that this year we actually just signed guys we actually
wanted in the free agency and didn’t cut most of them before game 4. No, for
this I dug into the stats and came up with the following.
After
8
|
2018
|
2019
|
Difference
|
% Change
|
Wins
|
4
|
5
|
+1
|
|
Offense
|
||||
Points
|
191
|
224
|
+33
|
+17%
|
Offenisve TDs
|
9
|
21
|
+12
|
+133%
|
Passing Yards
|
1677
|
2071
|
+394
|
+23%
|
Rushing Yards
|
935
|
973
|
+38
|
+4%
|
Sacks allowed
|
10
|
12
|
+2
|
+20%
|
Turnovers
|
17
|
13
|
-4
|
-24%
|
Defense
|
||||
Points allowed
|
202
|
183
|
-19
|
-9%
|
Passing Yds allowed
|
2071
|
1757
|
-314
|
-15%
|
Rushing Yds allowed
|
631
|
669
|
+38
|
+6%
|
Sacks
|
21
|
25
|
+4
|
+19%
|
Turnovers
|
20
|
7
|
-13
|
-65%
|
Special Teams
|
||||
Punt Return Avg
|
11.3
|
9
|
-2
|
-20%
|
Opponent Punt Ret Avg
|
10.6
|
18.3
|
+8
|
+73%
|
Kickoff return avg
|
22.5
|
31.5
|
+9
|
+40%
|
Opponent Kickoff Ret Avg
|
20.4
|
17.6
|
-3
|
-14%
|
Net punt avg
|
33.7
|
34.8
|
+1
|
+3%
|
Penalties
|
63
|
78
|
+15
|
+24%
|
Players Dressed
|
55
|
62
|
+7
|
+13%
|
It’s actually a lot of positives,
starting with the win column. For me the overall results are not surprising but
the specific areas are.
Coming into the season I think we fully
expected the O to suck, the D to be a question mark and the special teams to
continue being strong. Well instead we got an O that is pretty strong, a D that
still has some questions but is mostly good and a special teams that are an utter
disappointment.
Let’s start with the O. I don’t think
you need stats to tell you that they are infinitely better. 9 offensive TDs
last year vs. 21 this season. The
contrast made me wonder if our O is actually good or just seems awesome
compared to the garbage we endured last season. So I went back to 2017 when we
also had a good offense. We had 24 TDs
through 8 games then so we are actually pretty comparable. It’s nice
seeing the turnovers down and the O-line holding relatively steady (especially given the multiple personnel changes). People ask whether its
all Fajardo or whether McAdoo has changed. I say it’s a bit of both. Obviously if
you look at the offense when Glenn and Fajardo are under centre vs. pretty much
any other QB its obvious that good things happen when McAdoo has faith in his
QB and pretty much nothing happens but runs and hitches when he doesn’t. But
Fajardo is certainly having an impact. I remember hearing Coach McAdoo say that
every play he calls has someone going deep. It takes a QB willing to make that
throw. Fajardo has no fear of the deep ball and is accurate when he does.
Defense is actually better in pretty
much every category. Something that is probably a surprise given the departure
of Chris Jones who was one of the best defensive minds in the game. What you
are seeing under Shivers is something I predicted before the season… a far less
sexy but more steady and reliable D. You aren’t seeing the game changing plays
and piles of turnovers that Jones produced but you are seeing a D that is
locking things down and not taking risks that lead to big play potential. It would be nice to see the turnovers go up but as we saw
in the Montreal game, this D can step up when needed to take the pressure off an
underperforming O.
Special teams is the unpleasant surprise.
The only real positive has been kickoffs, though stats are a bit misleading there.
Our kickoff returns are legitimately better thanks to Purifoy. Our coverage
however… sure the returns are smaller but that’s mostly due to the fact that
Ferraro has so little distance on his kickoffs that our cover teams can take
like 3 steps and make a tackle. Punting is where things have all gone to hell.
Returns are down slightly but our coverage has been awful. Look, you’ve heard
me rant on Jon Ryan and his inability to kick outside the numbers. I don’t want
to beat that dead horse too much more. I'll just say that a casual observer
might think “hey our net punting is up by a yard with Ryan”. That is
technically correct but this marginal increase in net punting comes at insanely
high risks as we have already given up 8 big plays on kick returns compared to just 3 last season. I’d rather a slightly lower net and more reliable coverage than this “kick it like hell and hope for the best” strategy we are running. Honestly did not expect special teams to be the biggest concern in Dickenson’s first year coaching. Hope he gets that figured out.
So the early results for Dickenson have been
mostly positive. For me, the big question will be how he does down the stretch.
Chris Jones was notorious for terrible starts to the season but then playing
great football down the stretch. If Dickenson can likewise have this team peak
late in the season good things will be in store.
4 comments:
The defensive numbers being slightly better is a big surprise. Just curious, for points allowed did you take out the return TDs and TD's given up by the offence? (although I think there only is one of those)
Those numbers are total points allowed. If we go to just points allowed by the D we are at 152 this year, down from 184 in 2018.
Defense certainly doesn't seem that much better to the eyes but they are getting it done
The entertainment value is up too. It is always more difficult to get excited about a team with no offence even if they are winning. A long way to go but feeling pretty optimistic.
Dan - Optimism is the right word. We've seen that all 3 phases can play well (at times).
Post a Comment