Riders
25 – RedBlacks 30
As I mentioned on in my game
preview I did not go to the game. I was rocking out to Metallica. Turns out I
chose correctly as I was just as likely to see Lars Ulrich play competent
offense as I was the Riders. It was probably a good thing for my blood pressure that I wasn’t there. I did not go back and watch the game... as a Rider/Vikings fan I realize that I am by my nature a glutton for punishment but even I have my limits. I’ve watched the
highlights and poured over the stats sheets. The texts I was receiving
contained more than enough curse words to give me a good sense of what was
going on.
I’ll give you a sense of what
was going through my mind as I caught myself up on what happened in the game:
·
How
in ^$^$^ is it possible to lose a game where you return 2 kicks for TDs?!? Has
that ever happened? That’s gotta be the football equivalent of managing to lose
a 21 hand in blackjack.
·
Let’s
look and see if we can find where things went wrong for our O. Well Collaros
completed 10 passes… that usually not a good sign.
·
Well
Thigpen is our best offensive weapon. How many times did he touch the ball
offensively? Twice. Twice?!?! Who do we think has a better chance of scoring
than him? Apparently Josh Stanford because that’s who we targeted in the
redzone on that first pick. Pro Tip: Nothing good happens when you target Josh
Stanford in the redzone.
·
Roosevelt
is our next best offensive weapon. How did he do? Well we didn’t even target him
until the second half and looked his way about as often as Josh Stanford. Makes
sense.
·
What
about Williams-Lambert? Not targeted until 5 mins left in the game. Well why
look his way when Stanford is on the field.
I won’t dwell on this too
much. Since Saturday I imagine there has been sufficient discussion on how
terrible Collaros played and how our Offensive Coordinator seems to be taking a
George Constanza approach and doing the opposite of what most instincts would
tell you. Or at least the opposite of what a competent OC would do. Sure his “offense”
is on pace to score just 23 TDs this season which is less than any team since 2010
(which is as far back as I was prepared to look) and that includes the
expansion RedBlacks in their first season. But why focus on that when you can
focus on the supreme awesomeness of the hitch screen (which by the way? Has that
ever worked for us? I can’t remember an instance of it going for any decent
distance)? It’s not news to anyone that we have these explosive defense and
special teams but are being held back by one of the worst offenses in recent
memory.
I decided to do a check in to
see where we are at after 12 games as compared to last year. We have one more
win and if you look at every category that doesn’t involve passing or offensive
points we are ahead as well.
After 12
|
2016
|
2017
|
Difference
|
%
Change
|
Wins
|
6
|
7
|
+1
|
|
Offense
|
||||
Points
|
353
|
303
|
-50
|
-14%
|
Offensive
TDs
|
36
|
15
|
-21
|
-58%
|
Passing
Yards
|
3717
|
2509
|
-1208
|
-32%
|
Rushing
Yards
|
847
|
1314
|
+467
|
+55%
|
Sacks
allowed
|
31
|
14
|
-17
|
-55%
|
Turnovers
|
19
|
24
|
+5
|
+26%
|
Defense
|
||||
Points
allowed
|
309
|
303
|
-6
|
-2%
|
Passing
Yds allowed
|
3508
|
3146
|
-362
|
-10%
|
Rushing
Yds allowed
|
1157
|
1118
|
-39
|
-3%
|
Sacks
|
21
|
29
|
+8
|
+38%
|
Turnovers
|
29
|
32
|
+3
|
+10%
|
Special Teams
|
||||
Punt
Return Avg
|
11.3
|
13.6
|
+2.3
|
+20%
|
Opponent
Punt Ret Avg
|
10.5
|
9.2
|
-1.3
|
-12%
|
Kickoff
return avg
|
22.7
|
23.8
|
+1.1
|
+5%
|
Opponent
Kickoff Ret Avg
|
20.2
|
20.2
|
0.0
|
0%
|
Net
punt avg
|
34.6
|
34.1
|
-0.5
|
-1%
|
Penalties
|
97
|
94
|
-3
|
-3%
|
Players Dressed
|
73
|
63
|
-10
|
-14%
|
Saturday was a big let down
for a team riding a big high but they have still positioned themselves for a
solid finish to the season. Lots to work on yet (and by lots I mean primarily
just offense) but this team is still trending in the right direction.
When have you ever known the
Riders to do things the easy way?
your table should say 2017 and 2018 for the two columns.
ReplyDeleteotherwise, solid analysis as always. what a shitshow of a game. i wonder what Sheldon had to say.....
Two problems, McAvoy & Collaros. Collaros' stats have been consistent over his last 17 games in 2017 & '18. Consistently bad. Turns out even with an Offensive Line allowing the fewest sacks, his half season of games played in Regina is statistically maginally worse than his half season starting in the Hammer. We're paying him to be Zach 2015. Looks like Zach 2018 is a rerun of Zach 2017. He may be our best alternative so YIPPEE.
ReplyDeleteAnon 1 - Yeah apologies for the typo on the years. I avoid call in shows.
ReplyDeleteAnon 2 - Agreed, Collaros is not living up to expectations. Still McAdoo needs to do more to help him.. like actually give the ball to Thigpen on a regular basis.